DanK, you are completely right that "most people are good, decent folks who just want to co-exist with others and maybe make some kind of difference."
And the simple fact is that the people who work for the FDA and pharmaceutical companies are exactly that. “good, decent folks who just want to co-exist with others and maybe make some kind of difference."
I realize that it is easy and fun to believe in conspiracies, urban legends and fairy tales. I myself believe in the Loch Ness Monster because 1. It is harmless to do so, and 2. I saw the Loch Ness Monster when I was at Loch Ness in Scotland. If truly pressured I would be forced to admit that what I saw was probably an optical illusion and that there is no Loch Ness Monster, but it is fun to believe in it and so I choose to do so.
But believing in some things isn’t so harmless.
There is no conspiracy. I don’t doubt that there are bad people in the world, and some of them might work for the FDA and some of them might work for pharmaceutical companies, but the vast majority of people working there are normal folks who honestly have the best interests of the American people at heart.
I work with employees of the FDA and many, many pharmaceutical companies everyday, in all ranks and file. My boss was a higher-up (Vice President) at Abbot pharmaceutical before he decided to come work for the review board side of the process. He cares deeply, almost obsessively, about the care and protection of sick people. I know folks from GlaxoKlineSmith, from Pfizer, and from pretty much every drug-producing company you could name. They are everyone of them the kind of “good, decent folks” you describe. So are the people working for the FDA.
They care very deeply about the needs of the American people, and they understand the challenges of delivering safe, effective medicine, of balancing the risks and benefits, and of helping the greatest number of people they can, all while maintaining their business.
And of course they want to make money. So do I. And there are some whose desire for money outranks their ethical principals, as in every single company on Earth. Fortunately, those people are not the majority. And when they are sniffed out, they are disgraced and fired. They are the exception, not the rule.
Ethics are such a HUGE part of medicine. The ethical decisions take as big a role as the science involved. Almost all medicine carries some sort of side-effects, and the science is never nearly as precise as one would hope. No matter how much you test something, you never really know what is going to happen when the drug is put out for wide sale.
Choices must always be made, and the decision-makers err on the side of precaution more than anything else. Many, many more drugs fail the test than pass. For every thousand or so drugs tested two or three might actually be granted drug licenses. The rest carry too much risk, or (more often) cannot prove their benefit in a controlled trial.
Placebo tests are the big killer. Most drugs fail against double-blind placebo tests. Even though science says that these chemicals should have a certain effect, if the patient can’t tell the difference between a placebo and the real thing, then the drug fails. The well-being of the patient is the ultimate barrier. We don’t want people wasting their hard-earned money on things that have no effect beyond placebo. It isn’t fair or ethical to allow that.
This fear you have of the eradication of vitamin and mineral sellers is just bizarre. No one would want that. Just the eradication of snake oil salesmen, of dealers in “shark cartilage” and “royal jelly.”
Currently, there is NO quality control of “supplements.” People can claim out-and-out lies, and there is nothing anyone can do about it. As long as they couch their language carefully, with terms like “has been shown to…” and “many people…” without making any direct claims, then they cannot be sued.
And what are these “impossible-to-comply-with FDA regulations?” That the treatment works? That is the only FDA regulation. Can you prove that your treatment works? If the answer is yes, off you go. If the answer is no, then you don’t get to put it out for sale.
The only people who find those regulations impossible to comply to are those who don’t have an effective treatment.
And yes, most artificial vitamins are not as good as natural ones, which is why most doctors don’t recommend them. I just had a physical with my doctor, and he said that vitamin supplements are almost useless: one should be getting the necessary vitamins from natural food products, not pills. If you need vitamin E, start eating more spinach, broccoli and seeds. If you need vitamin B3, well…there are a lot of natural sources. And all natural sources are better than popping a pill.
Oh, and as to L-tryptophane, a little research shows that you are wrong about that. In 1989 L-tryptophane caused 1,500 cases of permanent disability including at least thirty-seven deaths. Some studies linked the cases back to an impurity by the Japanese company, while other studies demonstrated that large doses of tryptophan produce metabolites which inhibit the normal degradation of histamine and excess histamine in turn has been proposed to cause EMS.
Because the conflicting research could not prove L-tryptophane to be 100% safe, in 1991 the FDA erred on the side of caution and banned the drug, as did many countries. On further research and consideration, the ban was relaxed in 2001 and repealed in 2002.
The ban was in effect a total of ten years, and L-tryptophane has been legal to sell for nine years now. You could run out and get a bottle today if you wanted one.
If you can not find it at your local store, here are some websites that would be happy to sell you a bottle or two.
http://www.vitaminshoppe.com/store/en/b ... ku=SR-1167http://www.drugstore.com/products/prod. ... =418507864So you are simply wrong about L-tryptophane. The sources that you get your information from are wrong about L-tryptophane. Perhaps it is time to consider that they might just possibly be wrong about other things too. Maybe everything.